Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'RA'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • The LuPUS Message Board
    • Announcements
    • What is the LuPUS Message Board?
    • A Welcome to New Members
    • User Problems
    • Links
  • Medical
    • Medical News 2003
    • Medical News 2004
    • Medical News 2005
    • Medical News 2006
    • Medical News 2007
    • Medical News 2008
    • Medical News 2009
    • Medical News 2010
    • Medical News 2011
    • Medical News 2012
    • Medical News 2013
    • Medical News 2014
    • Medical News 2015
    • Medical News 2016
    • Medical News 2017
    • Medical News 2018
    • Medication & Therapy
    • Lupus and Pregnancy
    • Sjögren’s syndrome
  • Non-Medical
    • LuPUS Message Board
  • Public
    • Guest & Test Messages
    • Free Offers
    • Contributors

Blogs

  • Admin
  • Admin
  • Changes To My Diet For Health Reasons

Categories

There are no results to display.


Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 2 results

  1. UK rheumatologists use factors other than NICE guidelines to treat patients with RA June 27, 2016 LONDON — Rheumatologists from the United Kingdom consider other factors apart from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, or NICE, clinical guidelines on cost to make decisions on anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy prescription doses, according to a speaker here at the EULAR Annual Congress. “Rheumatologists’ … experiences come into some of this as well, so if they are used to using one particular treatment they would be more likely to use it subsequently,” Sean Gavan, PhD, of the Manchester Centre for Health Economics, United Kingdom,said during a press conference. “There was a sense from all of my participants that, to some extent, NICE guidance was restrictive of what they could do, and so to combat this, they were selective to what treatments they gave patients earlier on to free up more treatments down the line. Occasionally, they would manipulate the DAS28 score to give [anti-tumor necrosis factor] therapy to patients who, according to NICE guidance, would not be allowed to have that treatment.” Gavan and colleagues conducted telephone interviews with 11 consultant rheumatologists from hospitals in England. Rheumatologists were asked to speak of factors that influence their decisions for treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which included the decision to initiate anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy, choice of first-line anti-TNF therapy and treatment options in remission. Investigators used thematic framework analysis to analyze interview transcripts. Results showed that the participants’ choice for first-line anti-TNF treatment was rarely influenced by costs, except when local service commissioners offered a less expensive anti-TNF. Gavan and colleagues found when it came to first-line biosimilar anti-TNF agents, participants’ expressed cautious optimism due to potential cost savings. Participants’ tried to maintain clinical autonomy and involved patients in decision-making when use of cheapest anti-TNF was considered. “A lot of the participants suggested the clinical evidence base was, perhaps, slightly ahead of what NICE was saying currently in its guidance, but then when they decided to implement certain treatments decisions they were selective over which pieces of evidence they used to guide certain decisions,” Gavan said. – by Monica Jaramillo Reference: Gavan S, et al. Abstract #OP0198-HPR. Presented at: EULAR Annual Congress; June 8-11, 2016; London. Disclosure: Gavan reports no relevant financial disclosures.
  2. Pneumococcal Vaccine PPSV23 Does Not Protect RA patients News | February 13, 2017 | Rheumatoid Arthritis By Aisha T. Langford, PhD, MPH The 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) does not prevent pneumonia in rheumatoid arthritis patients, a new study finds. This study appears in the January 25 online issue of Arthritis Research & Therapy. “While PPSV23 vaccination is recommended for adults who are at least 65 years of age, our results suggest uncertainty regarding its effectiveness for pneumonia in rheumatoid arthritis patients at high risk for infections. Clinicians should keep in mind the patient’s age and the presence of interstitial pneumonia because such patients are at an increased risk of developing pneumonia,” researchers wrote. This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted with 900 rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biological or immunosuppressive agents. The goal of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of PPSV23 in preventing overall pneumonia in high risk patients. Patients were recruited between December 2012 and March 2014 from 32 hospitals across Japan and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the vaccine group receiving 0.5 ml of PPSV23 or the placebo group. The two primary endpoints were pneumonia and pneumococcal pneumonia. Additionally, demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated for potential associations with risk for developing pneumonia. Patients were monitored for 12 months after enrollment. In total, 17 of 464 patients in the vaccine group, or 3.7 percent, and 15 patients of 436 in the placebo group, or 3.4 percent, developed pneumonia. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Independent of group assignment, researchers found that the presence of interstitial pneumonia and older age were significantly associated with increased risk of developing pneumonia. It should be noted that neither glucocorticoid dosage or biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs usage predicted risk of developing pneumonia in this study. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis are at higher risk for developing pneumonia compared to the general population. Pneumonia is a vaccine-preventable condition in most patients and PPSV23 has been demonstrated to be effective at preventing invasive pneumococcal disease in older adults. However, the efficacy of PPSV23 in patients undergoing immunotherapy is not well researched or understood. To date, few of the clinical trials that have evaluated the effectiveness of PPSV23 have included patients with autoimmune diseases. Given that pneumonia is a leading cause of death among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, a better understanding of how and when to use PPSV23 with this population is needed. This is one of the first-known studies to evaluate a pneumonia vaccine in patients with autoimmune disease. “Our study confirmed that polysaccharide vaccine alone is not effective for prevention of pneumonia. Therefore, sequential administration of PCV13 and PPSV23 could also be an appropriate approach for the prevention for pneumonia in RA patients receiving immunosuppressive treatments,” wrote Kiyoshi Migita, of the Japanese National Hospital Organization, and colleagues. DISCLOSURES This research was supported by a grant from the Japanese National Hospital Organization Evidence-based Medicine study group. REFERENCES Yasumori Izumi, Manabu Akazawa, Yukihiro Akeda, et al. “The 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial,” Arthritis Research & Therapy. Published online January 25, 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-016-1207-7. http://www.rheumatologynetwork.com/news/pneumococcal-vaccine-ppsv23-does-not-protect-ra-patients?GUID=&XGUID=&rememberme=1&ts=14022017 Full Report URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5264490/
×